Tag Archives: aneurysm

The Problem With the Word “Should”

The word “should” may be one of the most dangerous words for a brain injury survivor.  It tends to appear in sentences such as “I should be walking already” or “I should have been back at my job by now.”  The word puts a tremendous amount of expectation on the survivor and implies that somehow the survivor is a failure since he or she did not achieve what he or she “should” have achieved.  Often, this word begins a series of statements in which survivors verbally punish themselves.  “I should have been able to walk without a wheelchair but I instead I fell.  I should be doing better with my mobility.  I am letting down my whole family!”  These “should” statements can lead to depression, stress and low self-esteem.

The reality is that each brain injury heals at its own rate and that each person is left with his or her own challenges to deal with.  After a serious brain injury, it often takes a survivor considerably longer than he or she may expect to reach goals due to the severity of the injury.  An injured brain is not like a broken arm.  You cannot put a brain in a cast as you would put an arm, expecting that in a relatively brief period of time the brain will be healed.  Brain injury rehabilitation is a process that takes time and patience.  The only applicable “should” is that the survivor should give full effort in his or her therapies.  That is all anyone, including the survivor, can reasonably ask for.  As long as the survivor is giving his or her best effort, the survivor is doing everything in their power to get better.  The rest of the process will depend on time, practicing/learning skills and how the brain heals following the injury.  Recovery cannot be rushed or forced.  “Should” statements that imply that somehow recovery ought to have gone differently are simply emotional snares that are best avoided.

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/


Why Are We “Suddenly” Hearing About Brain Injuries

Brain injuries are a hot topic in today’s media.  Whether it be football players with lasting damage due to concussions, soldiers suffering from brain injuries due to overseas conflicts or the latest youth sports concussion protocols, it seems that there are suddenly many news stories on brain injury that simply were not around just five or ten years ago.  Some individuals may be cynical and wonder whether brain injuries are simply the “diagnosis of the moment”, one of the many diagnoses that are suddenly “hot” but will disappear over time.  To those individuals, I would like to offer several rational reasons why brain injury stories have become more prominent over the last few years.

First, many people are now living with brain injuries who would have died from their injuries in previous eras.  The medical world has advanced significantly over the years and now doctors are able to save the lives of people who would have otherwise died. However, just because their lives were saved does not mean they emerged from their health emergency unscathed.  These survivors often have brain injuries which require treatment.  Please allow me to give an example of this change over time.  I once was talking over lunch with an older rabbi about Transitional Learning Center.  He relayed a story about his time at a synagogue many decades ago in Indiana.  A young man in his community had a serious motorcycle accident and as his rabbi, he visited the young man in the hospital.  After conversing for a while and finishing his visit, the rabbi exited the room.  As he left, the doctor pulled him aside and said “You know he will be dead in three days”.  The rabbi was shocked, having just had a full conversation with the young man.  But the doctor was correct.  The hospital had no means to manage his brain injury.  Due to either brain swelling, bleeding or both (the rabbi did not know the details), the young man passed three days later.  Today, a person with a similar motorcycle accident would have a surgery and other potential procedures to manage his injury and would stand a good chance of living, albeit with a brain injury.  Similarly, improvements in military field medicine are allowing many soldiers to survive blasts and other dangers that would have killed them in previous battles.  Thankfully, these soldiers still have their lives, but often struggle with long-lasting brain injuries suffered in their military service.

Second, it is important to acknowledge the active suppression of information regarding brain injuries in certain circles that is only recently coming to light.  Most famously, the NFL actively denied and hid data on the long-term brain injury effects of concussions to former football players.  Through a series of lawsuits, the NFL opened up about brain injuries and is now acknowledging the long-term injuries that many former players have suffered.  This has led to a complex $1 billion settlement for players with long-term effects of brain injuries.  Following these court cases, many other lawsuits have been filed against other professional and amateur sports, leading to further agreements and new safety protocols.  The suppression in the past contributed to an artificial perception that brain injuries were less common than they actually were.

Third, we are in an age of information so it is much easier to learn about what is happening to people across the country, and even across the world.  Just think about how often you hear or read stories about a robbery or kidnapping occurring hundreds of miles from where you live.  Until the age of the internet, most of those stories would be confined to local media.  Now, stories can go “viral” and suddenly everyone knows the details.  This phenomenon is equally true in the realm of brain injuries.  A simple keyword search of “brain injury” will bring up a plethora of local stories that prior to the age of the internet would have been hidden from most of the world.  These local stories existed in the past but only now d0 we have so much access to them.

Fourth, we are now having a more honest conversation about brain injuries.  In the past, people generally did not talk about brain injuries.  Athletes and soldiers rarely mentioned their deficits due to fear of sounding “weak”.  Individuals with brain injury deficits from car accidents, strokes or other methods were often afraid of negative views and discrimination if others knew about their deficits.  We are now coming to an age of sharing without fear.  It may be hard to believe but the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), the civil rights legislation that has allowed for a greater involvement of people with disabilities in the workplace without fear of discrimination, was only passed in 1990.  In comparison, the Civil Rights Act, which blocked discrimination due to issues such as race, gender, and religion, was passed in 1964.

Fifth, we are much more able to diagnose and treat brain injuries than in the past.  Technology such as MRI and CT exams to scan the brain and locate injuries are relatively new.  Moreover until fairly recently many people, even health professionals, did not even know the right questions to ask to identify a potential brain injury.  For instance, if a high school athlete is concussed in a game today, the coach and athletic trainer often have a protocol to follow to ensure proper health management.  Twenty years ago, the player would likely have been just given smelling salts, asked if he or she felt “okay” and sent back into the game.  In fact, many states now have mandatory concussion training for coaches and athletic trainers.  This was unheard of just a few years ago.  In the past, people with brain injuries were forced to suffer in the silence of unrecognized deficits.  Now, these brain injuries and their concomitant deficits are more likely to be accurately diagnosed.

Overall, there are many rational reasons why we are “suddenly” hearing about brain injuries in the media, despite these injuries having been an issue in the past.

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/



Just Be Grateful

“Just be grateful you are alive”

“Just be thankful you didn’t die”

“You should just focus on the fact you survived”

Brain injury survivors hear these types of well-meaning lines all the time.  They are used by family members and friends to help survivors see the “brighter side” during their recovery period.  And the statements are true; traumatic brain injuries, strokes and other forms of acquired brain injuries lead to death for millions of people worldwide every year.  It is worthwhile to be thankful for life.  But these lines can be double-edged swords.

Taking a step back for a moment, most survivors are truly thankful to be alive following their near-death experiences.  But that does not mean that they have not suffered real, painful losses.  At the same time as you want to encourage and support survivors, it is also important to allow them to mourn these losses.  There is nothing inherently wrong with lamenting loss of arm function or fluid speech, as long as this does not lead to a serious decline in mood or performance.  For instance, wouldn’t any person be upset if after decades of normal walking, he or she would have to learn how to walk all over again because of a stroke?  A balance has to be struck between fostering positive mood and allowing for reasonable mourning of loss.  “Just be grateful you are alive” is not an inherently bad statement as long as it is not being overused and preventing healthy adjustment to change.  However, using this line repeatedly often causes survivors to be frustrated and feel as if they cannot express their feelings.  Though it may be difficult for a family member or friend to see the survivors experience sadness or anger, this is often one of the steps necessary to make a successful transition to post-injury life.

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/


Give Yourself Permission

Brain injury survivors and their loved ones often try to approach life after an injury as if it is a fight.  Battle hard, stay strong and never let your enemy see your weaknesses.  But in truth, though there are some similarities in this analogy that are appropriate, life after an injury is not an actual fight.  In fact, by treating it as a real fight, sometimes survivors and their loved ones hurt themselves but not allowing themselves to feel and process certain emotions in a healthy manner.  By not processing emotions, individuals may allow these emotions to fester inside and come out at the wrong time or in the wrong situation.  Not processing emotions can lead to difficulties such as depression, anxiety and relationship stress.  I would like to encourage you to give yourself permission to feel these emotions.

Give yourself permission to get angry at the injury.  It truly is a frustrating and unpleasant experience.

Give yourself permission to cry.  There is no weakness in crying.  This is an appropriate reaction to a painful situation.

Give yourself permission to mourn.  There may be parts of you from the past that will no longer be part of your post-injury future.  It is okay to mourn their passing.

Give yourself permission to laugh.  Laugh at the moments of oddity.  Laughter , in measured amounts, is a reasonable coping technique during times of distress.

Most of all, give yourself permission to experience and value the full range of your emotions.  After all, our emotions are important aspects of who we are as people.  They are a central part of simply being human.  So please, give yourself permission to be the complete person that you are, despite your injury.

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/





Doing It Best

Jahvid Best appeared to be on the road to football stardom.  Drafted in the first round by the Detroit Lions, Best possessed blazing speed that was the envy of other running backs.  Unfortunately, his professional football career was ended prematurely during it’s second year due to the effects of concussions.  Best put forth great effort to get back into the NFL but doctors ruled against his return.  For many people, this would be the end of the story.  But for Jahvid Best, it was the start of something new.

One of the key tasks that brain injury survivors must navigate is to look at their retained abilities and identify what they can do best, in spite of their injury.  Best understood that his body was not ready to be tackled by 300 lb linemen, but he still had his speed.  Best worked tirelessly at his skills on the track.  The hard word paid off.  Best qualified for the Olympics in Rio.  He will be representing the island of nation of St. Lucia.  Best demonstrated how to thrive and succeed in spite of an injury!  Though he was not a TLC patient, we certainly think he is truly a hero for the brain injury community.  Identifying a survivor’s skills and choosing activities that match those skills is a key part of the rehabilitation process.  For more reading on Jahvid Best’s journey, click on the link below:


Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/




But Are You Getting Help?

Following a brain injury, family members will often spend every possible moment dedicated to efforts in support of an injured loved one and devote special attention to helping that survivor get the best care possible.  They with rare exception will spend countless hours on the phone battling insurance companies and filling out forms.  These family members must deal not only with stressors directly related to worrying over a  loved one’s health, but must make peace with planning for a suddenly very different future and must manage (sometimes alone) a freshly revealed terrifying financial mine field.

Brain  injury survivors themselves also face an enormous number of stressors as they struggle to regain command of basic skills and learn different ways to perform common tasks.  However there is a major difference in this regard between the brain injury survivors and their family members, particularly while the survivors are in rehabilitation.  The brain injury survivors are surrounded throughout the day by professionals trained in the treatment of brain injury who can help with mood, education and adjustment.  Survivors merely need look to their immediate surroundings to find an abundance of professional help to address any difficulties.  Family members generally do not have anything approaching such a level of support so readily available.  With all this in mind, it becomes clear just how thoroughly brain injuries are in fact a family affair.  All members of a family are affected, not just the brain injury survivor.  Likewise, all family members are part of the team necessary for managing long-term effects of the injury.  It is important that all members of the team (not just the survivor) are receiving the help and support that they need in order to adjust to these major life changes.

At TLC, staff commonly ask survivors’ families, “Are you getting help?” and “How can we help you through this process?”  It is important that family members do not neglect themselves while giving all they can to aid injured loved ones.  Such care taken is in the best interests of both the personal health of the family members in question and the optimal well-being of the survivors they support.  Caregivers with high stress levels often find themselves more susceptible to physical illnesses than the average person.  A family member side-lined by illness can offer only a fraction of the aid and support he or she would wish to.  Further, family members deserve to be allowed to live their lives to the most complete level of happiness possible (just like the survivors deserve to).  Put simply, if these family members are struggling themselves then they are placed in a severely disadvantaged position from which to help the survivors in their lives.

Family members of survivors should consider personal therapy and support groups as aids for their own psychological and spiritual adjustment (Both the Brain Injury Association of America and the American Stroke Association offer listings of local support groups).  These family members can often benefit from reaching out to friends and community resources in order to better address the management of difficulties.  Seeking help is not a sign of weakness but is instead a common sense step taken in the interest of maximizing both individual and family success and happiness.  Brain injuries are complex and stressful.  Family members should not pretend to be super-humans capable of handling anything and everything.  They should actively ask doctors and therapists for information on brain injury prognoses, education resources and proven strategies helpful in planning for the future.  Overall, one of the most important ways that family members can contribute to the advancing well-being of survivors in their lives is to remain sufficiently mindful of their own.

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/

Post-Traumatic Amnesia

In fairy tales the stricken princess lies still on the bed, oblivious to the world around her.  With the prince’s kiss, she suddenly wakes from her stupor and greets the world as if she had just simply been asleep.  Unfortunately, returning to life after a brain injury is no fairy tale and brain injury survivors do not simply wake with all of their skills intact.  For most survivors of serious brain injuries, there is a period of time after they “wake” from their comas in which they are in a state called Post-Traumatic Amnesia (PTA).  PTA contains many unique features and experiences which are important to understand.

Two of the main features of PTA are an inability to make new memories and disorientation.  This inability to make new memories (hence the “amnesia” portion of PTA’s name) manifests itself in many ways.  For instance, a brain injury survivor may report that though a coma suffered lasted for only two weeks, he or she has no memories of his or her first three months of therapy.  Brain injury survivors often relay that they were told  of visits by significant others and acquaintances during the survivors’ hospital stays, but due to PTA the survivors have no memory of these visits.  When PTA is particularly severe, a visitor may simply walk out of the room for a minute and find upon return that he or she is greeted by the survivor as a fresh arrival.  Sometimes family and friends can become unnecessarily upset that a survivor does not remember a visit, not understanding that making new memories is generally beyond the emerging skill level of a survivor in PTA.  Moreover, due to these memory difficulties survivors have significant difficulty learning new information in therapies (though they may still benefit from repetition of desired behaviors).

The second hallmark characteristic of PTA is disorientation.  Survivors in the midst of PTA often have difficulty recalling the month or year when prompted to do so.  They might not be able to accurately relate which city they are currently in or even state their own ages.  It is often helpful to have such information readily available, possibly on a notebook in front of the survivor or on a large board in a survivor’s room (though others may still need to cue the survivor to look at the accurate information).  Sometimes, a survivor may dispute accurate orientation information.  For instance, a survivor undergoing inpatient therapy in Galveston may argue that the therapist is crazy and that he or she is actually in Houston.

While survivors contending with PTA will often have a “deer in the headlights” look, as they improve this look eventually fades.  Families and therapy staff might notice that the survivor’s pupils may be dilated.  PTA is frequently accompanied by agitation.  Survivors often say and do things they normally would not say or do.  This excessive agitation may see expression in threatening or lashing out at loved ones or tearing out tubes and monitors attached to survivors’ bodies. It is not uncommon for a survivor to attempt to remove even an item as critical to his or her continued well-being as a breathing tube when in PTA.  Doctors may put the survivor on medication to help with agitation, though some are wary to do so as this may cause the PTA to take longer to resolve.

Survivors under the effects of PTA may struggle with hallucinations or delusions.  These hallucinations and delusions can take a paranoid flavor, such as believing that doctors are trying to poison them or that nurses are trying to steal their money.  Survivors in PTA may try to escape the hospital or take other unhealthy risks, such as trying to walk to the restroom when they are unable to physically do so.  As survivors with PTA generally have poor awareness of their injuries and can be impulsive, they will usually require 24/7 supervision and careful monitoring.

When survivors are in PTA, it is helpful to reduce the number and intensity of stimuli around them.  Making sure that a room is generally quiet and limiting the number of people in the room with the survivor at a given time can help lessen issues arising from agitation.  All important information should be easy to find, and a good example of a handy way to accomplish this is to put the date and what happened to the survivor on a dry-erase board or on the front of a notebook he or she is using.  Repetition is also important, as survivors with PTA may pick up information after many repetitions.  This can be as verbal repetition (e.g. repeating the year) or physical repetition (e.g. practicing a wheelchair transfer).  There is no way to “rush” a person through PTA nor is there a “magic pill” to cure it.  Families need to be patient as for some survivors, it may take months to emerge out of PTA.  Unfortunately, a few survivors will never quite fully emerge from it.

It is also important not to take negative words or behaviors from the survivor as personal attacks.  Such negativity is generally due to the brain injury and is not reflective of how a survivor really feels.  When brain injury survivors become healthier and are no longer in PTA, they often feel embarrassed by their PTA behaviors.  The survivors did not intend to be rude or mean, but their injuries were not yet healed enough to allow them to behave in a normal fashion.

Hopefully this post helped to clarify the symptoms of Post-Traumatic Amnesia.  Feel free to leave a comment below with any questions!

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/

Using Unique Characteristics to Help Memory

Following a brain injury many survivors face great struggles in the realm of memory.  This can be especially embarrassing when a brain injury survivor has difficulty remembering the name of a person with whom he or she is already well acquainted.  Utilizing techniques that make use of unique characteristics can make it far easier for survivors to remember important names in their lives.

Each person possesses many different characteristics.  These can include height, weight, eye color, tone of voice, expressed clothing preferences, etc.  Trying to remember a person’s name while matching it with all these disparate features can be a daunting task.  When meeting someone for the first time, it is often easier to find the one unique characteristic of the person that stands out most and pair that with the person’s name (e.g. “Paul is the tall guy” or “Susie has a rainbow tattoo on her neck”).  In this way the survivor only has to remember one characteristic in order to recall a person’s name rather than contend with the confusion that would accompany recalling many characteristics.  Unique characteristics can include aspects of physical appearance, dress, voice and behavior.  Let’s give a few examples in each category, using celebrities as examples, to demonstrate how one might execute this technique.

Physical appearance can include height, hair, size/shape of facial features, scars and tattoos.  For instance, former NBA player Shaquille O’Neal has brown eyes, a shaved head and a bright smile.  None of these features necessarily make him stand out.  However, if you were to meet him on the street and were picking one unique characteristic to match with his name, you would likely pick that he is over seven feet tall.  The pairing between height and name would clearly provide a more memorable association than anything involving those other  mentioned characteristics, and would make it far easier to recall Shaq’s name at a later time.  Similarly, comedian Carrot Top is of medium height with fair skin.  Again, these common features would not be useful to pair with his name as an aid to memory.  However, his striking red hair is quite unique and by pairing this unique characteristic with Carrot Top’s name, a survivor would be more likely to later recall his name.

Some people dress in a manner that is simply different from everyone else.  These differences in dress can also be paired with a person’s name in order to make it easier to recall that name.  Michael Jackson was known for wearing one white glove.  No one else was known for effecting that particular fashion choice.  If a survivor would have met Michael and wanted to remember his name, he or she could have paired Michael’s name with the one white glove.  Another example of this can be found in former United States Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.  Albright always wore pins on the upper left shoulders of her jackets.  A survivor could pair the pin with her name in order to better recall her name, rather than attempt to utilize any number of additional characteristics she possesses.

Just like a unique physical characteristic or a unique manner of dress, a unique voice can be paired with a person’s name to help remember him or her.  A voice might be recognized as unique due to a distinct tone, a particular accent or use of a singular delivery.  Actor James Earl Jones has a baritone voice which makes him a favorite choice for voice-over work in commercials and the like.  By pairing his deep voice with his name, a survivor could more easily identify him by name at a future meeting.  Similarly, actress Fran Drescher has an unmistakable New York accent which she played up in the television show “The Nanny.”  If a survivor was to meet her for the first time, the survivor could pair her accent with her name to help remember her at a later time rather than trying to remember any other likely more common of her features.

Sometimes, a new acquaintance may demonstrate a behavior that is so different from that of others that it can be used as one of these unique characteristics to aid in memory.  This can sometimes prove a little harder to use for memory unless the person in question demonstrates the identified behavior all of the time.  For instance, Elvis Presley often had a lip twitch/snarl when speaking which other people do not have.   In a different vein, John Wayne walked with his legs spread in a wide gait.  Both a constant lip twitch/snarl and idiosyncratic pattern of walking can be paired to names to more easily remember a person at a later time.

Survivors should not worry about whether the characteristic being used is complimentary to the other person.  If pairing the name “Julie” with “giant nose” helps the survivor remember Julie later, then this is fine.  There is no need to share with the other person that this technique is being used to aid memory.  The key is whether the characteristic is so memorable to the survivor that pairing the characteristic with the name will make it easier for the survivor to remember.  Further, this technique does not prevent the survivor from adding other, more mundane characteristics to his or her memory of the other person.  This technique is primarily designed for when a survivor is first trying to learn the other person’s name.

Hopefully this method will help survivors remember others’ names and be spared the embarrassment of forgetting!

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/


Who Will Be There When I Am Gone?

Fields related to the treatment of brain injury have improved by leaps and bounds over the last twenty to thirty years.  People who have suffered severe traumatic brain injuries are today surviving from injuries that would have once been fatal.  Health care professionals are able to manage associated medical issues and injury deficits left in the wake of traumatic brain injury better than ever before.  This has led to brain injury survivors with serious impairments being able to live longer than could have been imagined just a short time ago.  This also then means that many of these survivors will have need for others to serve as caregivers for them many years into the future (in some cases even for decades).  These caregivers may be called upon not only to help with day-to-day activities but also may be legally responsible for making medical, legal and financial decisions.  This brings us to an important question for those caregivers to consider. If something decisively unfortunate were to befall such a caregiver, have contingency plans been made to ensure that those care and legal responsibilities would continue to be sufficiently addressed?  For example, let’s say that a forty year-old man survives an aneurysm which leaves him unable to make his own decisions and subsequently his sixty-five year-old mother takes over these responsibilities for him.  A man that young in reasonably good health could fairly be expected to live at least another twenty years under such a circumstance, which would then put his mother at eighty-five.  Can anyone guarantee that his then eighty-five year old mother would continue to have the ability to make such decisions for him?  What happens if she faces a health issue such as Alzheimer’s or cancer that would effectively dismantle her ability to make his decisions for him?  Can anyone even guarantee that she will survive all the way to eighty-five?  Clearly, a plan needs to be put in place to designate a replacement to step into the mother’s critical role in this man’s life should she suffer incapacitation or pass away.

Putting together such a plan is no simple task and in many cases families will need to consult an attorney in order to formulate a coherent, legally binding plan.  These plans will generally involve issues such as daily care, financial management and legal responsibilities.  Questions have to be answered such as where the survivor will live and who will monitor disability or like payments should a current caregiver be unable to continue in his or her role.  Also, plans may need to be updated over time to reflect changes.  Using the earlier example, let’s say that in the mother’s will she appoints the survivor’s uncle to take over the legal responsibilities in her son’s life after she’s gone.  If this uncle’s wife developed a serious illness that suddenly demanded all his time and energy, the mother would likely want to update her will and appoint a new person to be responsible in case she became incapacitated or passed away.  Sometimes multiple people are listed in the plan (often in descending order), identifying a line of succession regarding those responsible for seeing to the survivor’s well-being.  This even further bolsters guarantee of a survivor’s continued security.  Sometimes roles are also divided among different individuals.  As example, one person may be responsible for daily physical care while a different person might be assigned ultimate authority over medical decisions.  No matter what plan is put in place (for this or for any other issue), the brain injury survivor should take part in the planning to the best of his or her abilities.

Planning for the future is a serious issue and should be started as early as possible.  Most survivors’ brain injuries make entrance into life suddenly and without warning, and caregivers can just as abruptly have their own issues present that prevent them from maintaining their caregiver roles.  For those that do not have the financial means to hire an attorney to develop a plan, there are legal aid offices throughout the United States that provide free legal services.  Follow the link below to search for a legal aid office in the United States.



Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/

Give Me Your Best 40%

Good days, bad days.  Everyone has them.  No one minds the good days, but those bad days can be such headaches.  Maybe you didn’t sleep well the previous night.  Perhaps your children were sick and were thoughtful enough to pass their germs on to you.  Those bad days pose a regular struggle that we can only push through.  However, sometimes bad days have potential to knock traumatic brain injury and stroke survivors to emotional low points markedly lower than anything experienced in their lives prior to the injury experience.

Often, patients will apologize to their therapists when they are having bad days, even though they would not feel the need to do so when going through a similar bad day at a job in their pre-injury lives.  In reality, no apology is truly necessary.  Having good days and bad days is not only a natural part of life, but is just as natural a component of the journey to recovery.  The progress of a healthy recovery can usually be observed to resemble that of a healthy stock market.  We can track plenty of ups and downs, but a general upward trend is just as persistently evident.

On rare occasions, a patient may ask a therapist if he or she can skip a session because he or she is having a bad day.  Unless the patient is deemed unable to participate in therapy by a facility nurse or doctor, the patient will be strongly encouraged to engage in therapy.  This can be a bit confusing for patients.  After all, why shouldn’t they be able to skip rehabilitation when having a particularly bad day?  I will explain some of the logic involved in having patients stay in therapy even on those bad days.

First, as stated earlier, bad days are a natural part of life.  Therapists know that on some days a patient will simply be unable to contribute that normal 100% effort.  This is fine.  Advances in therapy can be made even on bad days.  A therapist will always take a patient’s best effort, whether it be that patient’s best 80%, best 60% or even a 40% effort.  Every step forward in rehabilitation is a step in the right direction.  Second, it is important to remember that every activity in rehabilitation is aimed at facilitating success following discharge.  At home, just like in rehabilitation, there will be good and bad days.  Survivors need to be just as prepared to handle bad days at home as they are to handle the good ones.  For example, a patient may not want to work on hand skills necessary to use adaptive flatware on a bad day.  But what is that patient going to do when he or she is hungry at home on a bad day?  Will the patient not eat because he or she is having a bad day?  Good day or bad day, the same skills will be used to succeed at home and therefore they need to be practiced both on good days and bad days in therapy.

So don’t worry about having a bad day.  Just give therapy your best effort, even if on that day your best effort is only 40%!

Learn about brain injury treatment services at the Transitional Learning Center: http://tlcrehab.org/